Archives

Categories

Sanli Sanli 18 June 2008

Pros and cons of a fire-starter

Posted in PhD life, Research and education

firestarter

Entrepreneurship is a personal character that is mostly used for businessmen, but can also be found in scientists. In fact, as creativity is an essential ingredient for a successful scientific career, I may even claim that there sit more entrepreneurs in a research institute than a company, but I do not insist.

Some business-psychologists describe entrepreneurs as fire-starters because they love to initiate new projects and are always eager to bring a new idea, which they never lack, into reality. But, unfortunately, as soon as the project is in action the joy is over for the fire-starter. Soon it happens that he makes himself busy with a new idea and abandons the older one, even though the harvest time of the previous project has just started.

It is not easy to deal with a fire-starter in a scientific group. She is impatient and self-centered. He wants to pick up ten watermelons with one hand. He works at his own fast pace and expects all his colleagues to work full-time for his project. She often breaks the safety rules and does not clean up the shared working tables. He gets de-motivated and inefficient if he is forced to fulfill any other task than working on his brilliant new ideas.

On the other hand, I believe, fire-starters are essential for the refreshment of a scientific group or institute. They pump oxygen-rich blood into the veins of the group. They energetically bring in change and progress. They can be very productive if they are teamed with some colleague who has an achievers’ personality, or guided by a leader who well understands their character.

I think that it is important for institute-managers and group-leaders to identify fire-starter members and try to understand their personalities.

- - - - - -
If you like this post why don't you email subscribe to our new posts. Or subscribe to our RSS feed.
  1. Ronald Snijder

    23 Jun 2008 13:47, Ronald Snijder

    Looking at the description of the fire-starter as self centererd and impatient, I wondered how much of them are just “big egos”? (http://www.sciencesurvivalblog.com/research-and-education/do-we-really-need-to-have-big-ego’s_91)

  2. Timmo

    23 Jun 2008 14:35, Timmo

    Interesting way of selling yourself :)… Seriously: I don’t believe that entrepreneurship is being a personal character, nor am I sure that all good business men are good pioneers (or “fire starters” as you call them). I agree that both good scientists and good entrepreneurs need to have a passion for an outcome, and have to find new, creative ways to get there. However I would argue that pioneers are per se needed in scientific groups or misunderstood. Science is often just stubborn persevering, and more suited for the stayers.

  3. Sanli

    24 Jun 2008 8:19, Sanli

    I agree with you Timmo that a major part of currently active scientists are better characterized with words such as passion, patience and persistence. But I am not sure lack of entrepreneurs {yes, it is a personal character ;)} in science is just because they are not needed. I believe the difference in income and recognition plays the major role in the migration of fire-starters to business.

  4. Timmo

    10 Jul 2008 8:49, Timmo

    I read today that Google employees get to spend 20% of their working time on other than the main projects. For junior scientists, it could be a model in the beginning of their careers to prevent them from getting into a rut, and to stay sharp and creative for their main project.

  5. Unregistered

    31 Jul 2008 13:47, C. Bokhove

    This reminds me of the “plant” in Belbins team role model.